Neurodivergent POV: When people say “you’re wrong” — and years later you’re proved right

“Sometimes I think I’m the only one who notices things — then they tell me my facts aren’t valid. Years later, those facts show up. It’s not that I was delusional — it’s that my neurotype and the neurotypical system run on different rules.”

This post is written for anyone who’s been dismissed, told their perception is “not real,” or left wondering if there’s something wrong with them for thinking differently. I’ll use the term Alternate/Autistic NeuroType because it’s the way you described your experience — and I’ll show how that experience maps onto what research and lived-experience advocates call neurodivergence.

  • Neurodivergent people (autistic, ADHD, etc.) often perceive patterns, risks, or social dynamics differently. This can make others call those perceptions “invalid” — even when they’re later proven right. 

  • Diagnosis and recognition lag massively in adults: many autistic adults — especially older ones — remain undiagnosed. 

  • Worldwide prevalence estimates vary (WHO and CDC summaries): recent U.S. estimates show around 1 in 31 children identified in surveillance; global averages are often cited near 1% but vary by study and region. In Singapore recent local data suggests just over 1 in 100 young children may have autism. 

  • Famous examples: Temple Grandin and Greta Thunberg publicly describe their autism/Asperger’s and frame it as a difference — a way of thinking — not a sickness. Their stories show how neurodivergent traits can become strengths. 

1) What’s actually happening when Alternate/Autistic NeuroType (your mind) spots what NTs (neurotypicals) don’t

People with different neurotypes process sensory input, social cues, and patterns differently. That means:

  • You may notice systemic problems, patterns, or inconsistencies others miss.

  • You may describe things bluntly, or make connections that seem tangential to NT listeners — which leads some to dismiss you as “wrong” or “delusional.”

  • Often those “gut” observations are validated later because you’re attending to different cues (sensory detail, causal patterns, timelines) than the mainstream conversation does. 

This mismatch is a difference in wiring, not a moral failing or moral inferiority. Neurodiversity research and self-advocates stress that these are variations of human neurology, not diseases to be cured. 

2) Real-world examples: famous people who were dismissed — then proved powerful

Temple Grandin — a designer and professor who is autistic — talks about “thinking in pictures” and how that difference became a career advantage in animal-science design. She reframes autism as a way of being, not something to “fix.” 

Greta Thunberg — who has discussed having Asperger’s — has said her diagnosis is “a superpower” for her activism. When she was attacked or dismissed early on, she kept focusing on facts and data — which later strengthened her platform. 

These stories show two things:

  1. Neurodivergent traits can be huge strengths (focus, system-spotting, pattern thinking).

  2. Early dismissal is common — but persistence, structures that match the neurotype, and platforms that amplify different styles can turn those perceived weaknesses into impact.




3) Numbers: how common is it and how often is it missed?

  • U.S. surveillance (CDC): about 1 in 31 children aged 8 were identified with ASD in recent surveillance. This illustrates a rising identification trend but also regional variation. 

  • Global (WHO): rough global estimates vary — WHO has used figures near 1 in 127 in some summaries while noting big variation by study and region. 

  • Undiagnosed adults: a large review in the UK and related reporting suggests very high under-diagnosis among older adults — in some age groups ~89–97% go undiagnosed, highlighting systemic blind spots in adult detection. 

  • Singapore: recent local studies and reporting indicate just over 1 in 100 children around screening age show autism markers; official resources often use an estimate near 1% of the population while acknowledging local studies differ. (News Reference from Straits Times)

Bottom line: Many people who are neurodivergent are never diagnosed — which helps explain why their early observations and approaches are often misunderstood or labeled “invalid.”

4) Emotions and lived experience (what it feels like)

If you’ve been told your perception isn’t valid, common emotional reactions include:

  • Invalidation & gaslighting — “You’re wrong” leads to lowered confidence.

  • Frustration & anger — you keep seeing what others miss and feel dismissed.

  • Loneliness & isolation — social rules feel opaque; being “different” can be socially costly.

  • Relief & validation (after diagnosis or acceptance) — naming the experience often brings self-compassion and strategies.

    Psychological research and lived-experience accounts show these feelings are widespread among undiagnosed adults and those who don’t fit neurotypical social rules. 

5) Why neurotypicals often struggle to understand Alternate/Autistic NeuroType thinking

  • Different communication norms. NT social inference often relies on subtle small talk and implied cues; Alternate/Autistic NeuroType descriptions may be direct, literal, or pattern-based. That mismatch causes misinterpretation. 

  • Different sensory thresholds. Sensory differences change what details feel important. NTs may not appreciate why a particular detail is urgent or obvious to you. 

  • Institutional inertia. Systems (education, workplaces, medicine) were designed around NT expectations; when someone presents differently, their observations can be marginalized. The high under-diagnosis of adults reflects that institutional blind spot.

6) It’s not a sickness — here’s why that matters

The neurodiversity paradigm reframes brain differences as variations rather than illnesses. This matters because:

  • Language affects policy: “difference” pushes towards accommodation and rights; “disease” pushes towards cure and stigma. 

  • Many neurodivergent people want supports (communication adjustments, sensory-friendly spaces, workplace accommodations) — not cures. Interventions focus on functional support, mental health, and inclusion. Clinical guidelines in several countries emphasize improving services rather than “curing” neurology. 

7) Practical strategies for someone who keeps being told “you’re wrong”

  1. Document your observations. Keep a dated log or notes — when your pattern comes true, you’ll have a record. This helps with self-trust and offering evidence later.

  2. Find language that lands. Translate your observation into short, outcome-focused statements: “Here’s what I see, here’s the likely result in X weeks, here’s what would reduce risk.”

  3. Build allies. One NT ally who sees your method or trusts you can help bridge misunderstandings in teams.

  4. Consider assessment if you want it. A diagnostic route can provide accommodations and personal clarity — but it’s valid whether you get a label or not. (And many adults never get diagnosed; that’s common.) 


, , ,